Got to view the Season Five finale over the weekend, and it left me very, very angry.

The show has never been big on clear cut rules of time travel.  But there have always been certain things that they seem dedicated to avoiding just on the grounds of common sense.

This weekend, for the first time in 31 seasons, they stooped to Bill & Ted time travel.  Specifically, the current version of the Doctor is rescued repeatedly by a future version of himself...a version who could only exist if the current version was indeed rescued.  It's the equivalent of Bill and Ted commenting "After all this is done, we've got to remember to go back in time and drop an anvil on this guy's head," and then see an anvil fall out of the sky.  (Ok, it probably wasn't an anvil.  It's been a LONG time since I watched it.  But you get the picture.)

Bill & Ted got away with it because it was a comedy.  It wasn't supposed to be taken seriously.  But Doctor Who is a tad more serious.  More importantly, it's a series.  By allowing such a ridiculous mechanism to work, the writers have removed any future challenge to the Doctor.  Someone can always say "Well, why doesn't a future version of himself just rescue him again?"

And they didn't just do it once: the entire episode is rife with it.  It's like it was mocking those of us who expect competent writing.

In addition, most of this nonsense was yet again accomplished through the random introduction of a piece of technology. This time it's a bracelet that can time travel.  Apparently it can do everything the Doctor's TARDIS (which is large and bulky) can do, except it fits on your wrist.  Thanks for making the staples of the show obsolete, all because you were too lazy to write a real plot.

Finally, I'm left with a few, teeny, tiny questions, like:

  • Why does Rory eventually remember the events of the episode, even though he was very, very dead for all of it?
  • Why I am expected to believe that the power of one person remembering the Doctor can pull him across the boundaries of the universes?
  • Did the villians really create fake Romans in *real* Roman Britain?
  • BTW, how does basing their inventions off of things in Amy's head make it more compelling mystery to attract the Doctor?  I mean, other than it allowing River Song to easily figure it out by wandering through Amy's bedroom.
  • Why, as the universe is collapsing, is the Earth the last to succumb, especially since the Sun was already eradicated?
  • Why, if the TARDIS is exploding in all point of space-time, it also just happens to be burning in space at the exact right location to keep the Earth livable?
  • Why, if the villians could finally agree on working together to get rid of the Doctor, could they not comprehend that getting rid of the Doctor does not stop the TARDIS from exploding, which was their ultimate goal?
  • The Pandorica needs living DNA of Amy to revive Amy.  Check.  Yet it only needs one molecule of the universe to revive the universe?

6 comments

  1. Konrad Zielinski // July 26, 2010 at 7:29 PM  

    Actually they broke their own rules much more severely than that. You can't interfere in your own timestream is a cardinal rule of Dr who.

    In the New Season 1 Episode 8 'Fathers Day' when Rose does this (and save her father) she creates a paradox that nearly destroys the Earth. And in the end he has to die anyway in order to set things right.

    In the new Season 2 Episode 4 'The Girl in the fireplace' The doctor explicitly says that he can't reenter his own time stream, and hence can't save Reinette.

    Heck as Recently as Episode 8 in this season. The Doctor stops Amy from talking to her future self.

    The better question is why was it that Amy's memory of the Doctor could bring him back, and Dr Sungs memory could not when she is supposedly the Doctor's wife, and has the most memories of him.

  2. Konrad Zielinski // July 26, 2010 at 7:48 PM  

    Actually now that you made me think about it. the canonical way of fixing this would have been to get one of the previous incarnations of the doctor involved. As the different versions of the doctor seem to be permitted to enter each others time streams. And have done so on a number of the N doctors episodes in the past. Where N has ranged from 2 to 5.

  3. Catherine Noble Beyer // July 29, 2010 at 2:55 PM  

    I did remember Rose, but I didn't feel it quite applied here. I totally forgot the comment from Girl in the Fireplace, however.

    It wasn't just him interfering with his own timeline that bothered me. It was the purely nonsensical way in which they did it. They did it over and over with no real logic to it, when there has always, at minimum, been the expectation that such a thing is problematic.

    The entire story is a mess. Things happen not because they are logical but because the writers just want them to happen. It's been a problem throughout this season, but the finale was the culimation of it. (The Season 4 finale had similar problems) It's totally the opposite of the writing of the earlier seasons, which overall really impressed me.

  4. Unknown // July 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM  

    I can help with the "bracelet". First, ever watch Torchwood? I you have you will have recognized it. The Doctor took it from Jack at the end of 'Journey's End' episode. He scolded him for using it.
    I actually found the episode entertaining. I watch the marathon that the BBC ran before the final episode. I just keep telling myself that this is a new Doctor and new stories and new direction.

  5. Digger // August 2, 2010 at 11:05 PM  

    I'll admit to not having seen the episode; but perhaps they'll all wake up, and it will have been a dream?

    Dallas did it after a whole season, after all...

  6. Anonymous // August 3, 2010 at 7:49 PM  

    Then it would be like the House finale of the season I have no idea the number of!